𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Chemical shift–based water/fat separation: A comparison of signal models

✍ Scribed by Diego Hernando; Zhi-Pei Liang; Peter Kellman


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2010
Tongue
English
Weight
735 KB
Volume
64
Category
Article
ISSN
0740-3194

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Quantitative water/fat separation in MRI requires careful modeling of the acquired signal. Multiple signal models have been proposed in recent years, but their relative performance has not yet been established. This article presents a comparative study of 12 signal models for quantitative water/fat separation. These models were selected according to three main criteria: magnitude or complex fitting, use of single‐peak or multipeak fat spectrum, and modeling of T decay. The models were compared based on an analysis of the bias and standard deviation of their resulting estimates. Results from theoretical analysis, simulation, phantom experiments, and in vivo data were in good agreement. These results show that (a) complex fitting is uniformly superior to magnitude fitting, (b) multipeak fat modeling is able to remove the bias present in single‐peak fat modeling, and (c) a single‐T model performs best over a range of clinically relevant signal‐to‐noise ratios (SNRs) and water/fat ratios. Magn Reson Med, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Compressed sensing for chemical shift-ba
✍ Mariya Doneva; Peter Börnert; Holger Eggers; Alfred Mertins; John Pauly; Michael 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 785 KB

## Abstract Multi echo chemical shift‐based water–fat separation methods allow for uniform fat suppression in the presence of main field inhomogeneities. However, these methods require additional scan time for chemical shift encoding. This work presents a method for water–fat separation from unders

Noise analysis for 3-point chemical shif
✍ Venkata V. Chebrolu; Huanzhou Yu; Angel R. Pineda; Charles A. McKenzie; Jean H. 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 519 KB

## Abstract ## Purpose: To model the theoretical signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) behavior of 3‐point chemical shift‐based water‐fat separation, using spectral modeling of fat, with experimental validation for spin‐echo and gradient‐echo imaging. The echo combination that achieves the best SNR performa

On the application of chemical shift-bas
✍ Hyeonjin Kim; Alexander B. Pinus; Jinghua Wang; Philip S. Murphy; R. Todd Consta 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 873 KB

## Abstract Chemical shift‐based multipoint water‐fat separation methods have been applied in balanced steady‐state free precession (bSSFP) sequences because of the high signal‐to‐noise‐ratio (SNR) attainable. In this approach the echo formation is approximated to occur concurrently for both water

T1 independent, T2* corrected chemical s
✍ Catherine D.G. Hines; Alex Frydrychowicz; Gavin Hamilton; Dana L. Tudorascu; Kar 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 531 KB

## Abstract ## Purpose: To determine the precision and accuracy of hepatic fat‐fraction measured with a chemical shift‐based MRI fat‐water separation method, using single‐voxel MR spectroscopy (MRS) as a reference standard. ## Materials and Methods: In 42 patients, two repeated measurements were

Improved fat suppression using multipeak
✍ Richard Kijowski; Michael A. Woods; Kenneth S. Lee; Kuya Takimi; Huanzhou Yu; An 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 391 KB

## Abstract ## Purpose To evaluate and quantify improvements in the quality of fat suppression for fast spin‐echo imaging of the knee using multipeak fat spectral modeling and IDEAL fat‐water separation. ## Materials and Methods T~1~‐weighted and T~2~‐weighted fast spin‐echo sequences with IDEAL

Comparison of various density functional
✍ Keith W. Wiitala; Christopher J. Cramer; Thomas R. Hoye 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 295 KB

## Abstract Full ^1^H and ^13^C NMR chemical shift assignments were made for two sets of penam β‐lactams: namely, the diastereomeric (2__S__, 5__S__, 6__S__)‐, (2__S__, 5__R__, 6__R__)‐, (2__S__, 5__S__, 6__R__)‐, and (2__S__, 5__R__, 6__S__)‐methyl 6‐(1,3‐dioxoisoindolin‐2‐yl)‐3,3‐dimethyl‐7‐oxo‐4