✦ LIBER ✦

Checking for interviewer bias in outcome assessment: a method for strengthening the design of prospective, randomised trials in surgery

✍ Scribed by M. Koller; S. Hoffmann; M. Rothmund; W. Lorenz; U. Plaul

Publisher: Springer
Year: 2004
Tongue: English
Weight: 145 KB
Volume: 389
Category: Article
ISSN: 1435-2451
DOI: 10.1007/s00423-003-0428-9

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Comparing patients’ and clinicians’ asse

Comparing patients’ and clinicians’ assessment of outcomes in a randomised trial of sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer (the RACS SNAC trial)

✍ Michaella J. Smith; P. Grantley Gill; Neil Wetzig; Tatiana Sourjina; Val Gebski; 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 Springer US 🌐 English ⚖ 194 KB

Adenosine sestamibi SPECT post-infarctio

Adenosine sestamibi SPECT post-infarction evaluation (INSPIRE) trial: A randomized, prospective multicenter trial evaluating the role of adenosine Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT for assessing risk and therapeutic outcomes in survivors of acute myocardial infarction

✍ John J Mahmarian; Leslee J Shaw; Gerald H Olszewski; Bradley K Pounds; Maria E F 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 191 KB

## Background. Preliminary studies indicate that adenosine myocardial perfusion single photon tomography (SPECT) can safely and accurately stratify patients into low and high risk groups early after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods and Results. INSPIRE is a prospective, randomized multic