✦ LIBER ✦

Check size and defocusing effects on equipotential maps of pattern-evoked electroretinograms

✍ Scribed by E. Adachi-Usami; N. Kuroda; Y. Kakisu

Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Year: 1987
Tongue: English
Weight: 455 KB
Volume: 65
Category: Article
ISSN: 0012-4486
DOI: 10.1007/bf00149943

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis

The spatial distribution of the pattern-evoked potentials on the face was studied with a simultaneous 16-channel recording system. The potentials had the first positive component at a peak latency of approximately 55 msec, which was much earlier than the latency of the response picked up from the scalp. The maximal potential value in the maps was found at the region around the stimulated eye.

This configuration of the equipotential map was not influenced by defocusing and check size of the pattern, but was altered by changing the contrast.

Our results of equipotential maps constructed at around 55msec after pattern reversal proved that the responses recorded in the facial region originated in the retina and were not a reflection of the scalp potentials.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

The effects of age on steady-state patte

The effects of age on steady-state pattern electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials

✍ Hiroyuki Tomoda; Gastone G. Celesia; Mitchell G. Brigell; Sandra Toleikis 📂 Article 📅 1991 🏛 Springer-Verlag 🌐 English ⚖ 580 KB

Steady-state pattern-reversal electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials were simultaneously recorded in two groups of young and elderly normal volunteers. The young group consisted of 23 subjects (13 women and 10 men) aged 18 to 28 years, and the elderly group consisted of 24 subjects (11 wome

Effect of stimulus field size and locali

Effect of stimulus field size and localization on the binocular pattern reversal visual evoked response

✍ Osamu Katsumi; Tatsuo Hirose; Tsuyoshi Tanino 📂 Article 📅 1988 🏛 Springer-Verlag 🌐 English ⚖ 574 KB

The role of the central and peripheral stimulus fields on monocular and binocular amplitude and binocular summation of the pattern reversal visual evoked response were investigated. When the central stimulus field size was smaller than 2.4 degrees, there was no significant difference between the amp