Charge Density and Experimental Electrostatic Potentials of Two Penicillin Derivatives
✍ Scribed by Armin Wagner; Ralf Flaig; Birger Dittrich; Horst Schmidt; Tibor Koritsánszky; Peter Luger
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2004
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 164 KB
- Volume
- 10
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0947-6539
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Two penicillin derivatives, the active penamecillin and the inactive penamecillin‐1β‐sulfoxide, were used to study the relationship between their charge density and their activity. Single crystals of both compounds were measured at the synchrotron beamline F1 at the HASYLAB/DESY, at 100 K and up to resolutions of around 0.4 Å. Experimental charge densities were obtained by using the Hansen–Coppens multipole formalism. The cleavage of the amide bond in the β‐lactam ring is of paramount importance in the mechanism of action of penicillins. Topological analysis of this bond in terms of Bader's AIM theory showed that its strength is equal in both compounds; therefore a direct influence of bond strength on the activity can be ruled out. However, the two derivatives differ significantly in their experimental electrostatic potentials. These differences are discussed and provide further insight into the chemistry and activity of penicillins.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
Four methods for deriving partial atomic charges from the Ž quantum chemical electrostatic potential CHELP, CHELPG, Merz-Kollman, and . RESP have been compared and critically evaluated. It is shown the charges strongly depend on how and where the potential points are selected. Two alternative method
We compare the electrostatic potential surrounding several natural and synthetic nucleic acid bases calculated using an atom-centered multiple expansion (ACME) derived from integration of the charge distribution with that from potentialderived charges (PDCs) obtained using the CHELPG procedure. When
To determine the reliability of the restrained electrostatic potential Ž . derived REPD charge method described in a companion article, the free energies of hydration of 22 simple organic molecules were calculated using free energy perturbations and linear response theory. Of the four charge sets ex