𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Characterizing complex reaction mechanisms using machine learning clustering techniques

✍ Scribed by Edward S. Blurock


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2003
Tongue
English
Weight
131 KB
Volume
36
Category
Article
ISSN
0538-8066

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

A machine learning conceptual clustering method applied to reaction mechanisms provides an automatic and, hence, unbiased means to differentiate between reactive phases within a total reactive process. Similar reactive phases were defined by means of local reaction sensitivity values. The method was applied to the Hochgreb and Dryer aldehyde combustion mechanism of 36 reactions. Three major time ranges were found and characterized: an initial phase of aldehyde reaction, an intermediate phase where only a small amount of aldehyde is left, and an end phase of reactions to final products. Further refinements of these phases into subtime intervals were found. All ranges found could be chemically justified. This method is meant as a supplement to existing methods of mechanism analysis and its main purpose is the automatic characterization of existing mechanisms and can potentially be used for mechanism reduction. Β© 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Chem Kinet 36: 107–118, 2004


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Automatic characterization of ignition p
✍ Edward S. Blurock πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2006 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 191 KB

## Abstract Machine learning clustering techniques are used to characterize and, after the training phase, to identify phases within an ignition process. For the ethanol mechanism used in this paper, four physically identifiable phases were found and characterized: the initiation phase, preignition

Comparison of global and local sensitivi
✍ James J. Scire Jr.; Frederick L. Dryer; Richard A. Yetter πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2001 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 265 KB

## Abstract Many rate constant measurements, including some β€œdirect” measurements, involve fitting a complex reaction mechanism to experimental data. Two techniques for estimating the error in such measurements were compared. In the first technique, local first‐order elementary sensitivities were u