Characterization of the distribution of glucose oxidase in Penicillium sp. CBS 120262 and Aspergillus niger NRRL-3 cultures and its effect on integrated product recovery
✍ Scribed by M. Johnstone-Robertson; K.G. Clarke; S.T.L. Harrison
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2008
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 150 KB
- Volume
- 99
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0006-3592
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Glucose oxidase (GO) is an important industrial enzyme typically purified from Penicillium and Aspergillus sp. As GO distribution within the cultures influences process design for maximal product recovery, distribution of GO activity in Penicillium sp. CBS 120262 and Aspergillus niger NRRL‐3, during mid‐exponential and stationary phases, is compared. On progression from mid‐exponential to stationary phase, the percentage GO activity in the cytoplasm decreased 1.6‐ and 1.3‐fold in Penicillium sp. and A. niger respectively. In Penicillium sp., a concomitant 1.8‐ and 1.9‐fold decrease in the percentage GO activity in the cell envelope and slime mucilage respectively, translated into a 2.0‐fold increase in the extracellular fluid. In A. niger, decreasing cytoplasmic GO activity was accompanied by 1.3‐fold increases in the cell envelope and slime mucilage, with a 1.3‐fold decrease in the extracellular fluid. Similar trends were observed in specific GO activities. As final GO activity recovered is governed by the purification program, recovery from the extracellular fluid plus cell extract or from the extracellular fluid only were compared through simulating processes of varying complexity. A critical yield for each purification stage was identified above which recovery from the extracellular fluid plus cell extract exceeded that from extracellular fluid alone. These results highlight the influence of microorganism, harvest time and efficiency of downstream process on GO activity delivered. In the systems studied, Penicillium sp. is the organism of choice and should be harvested during stationary phase. The purification process chosen should be informed by both enzyme distribution and individual purification stages yields. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2008;99: 910–918. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.