𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Characterization of the canopy structure of Dutch grasslands

✍ Scribed by Louis M. Fliervoet


Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Year
1987
Tongue
English
Weight
863 KB
Volume
70
Category
Article
ISSN
1385-0237

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


In order to characterize the canopy structure of different grassland types 50 stands, representing 15 syntaxonomically distinct types, were examined by harvesting the standing crop during the main flowering period. The types differ in water and nutrient conditions and vary largely in aboveground phytomass (0.5-23 t β€’ ha-1 and Leaf Area Index (0.4-21: bifacial). Living aboveground phytomass and canopy structure are almost entirely determined by phanerogams. The graminoids generally dominate over the forbs. Variation in aboveground phytomass is related to foliage characteristics such as Aboveground Leaf Area Ratio, Specific Foliage Weight and Leaf Area Development. A PCA with these canopy variables and the variables canopy height, phytomass density and the phytomass ratios stem-leaf-inflorescence shows a clear arrangement related to aboveground phytomass and LAI. The grassland stands can be divided into four groups of different productivitiy levels for which various combinations of canopy variables are characteristic. Leaf size and leaf inclination are also used for characterization of the different grasslands. Ordinations with these variables by means of PCA and CCA resemble partly to those computed with the canopy variables of aboveground phytomass and LAI. Small leaf sizes are characteristic for low productive grasslands, while the largest leaves occur in high productive grasslands, although they mostly do not belong to the species contributing most strongly to the phytomass of the stand. The leaf inclinations erect and erecto-patent are most common in each grassland. Horizontal leaf areas occur less frequent, but they are relatively well presented in some high productive grasslands. Ranges in leaf size vary more than ranges in leaf inclination do for this series of grasslands. However, leaf size and leaf inclination are useful variables for characterization of grassland canopies in a hierarchical way, where phytomass and leaf area are the first criteria for such a characterization.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Temporal and spatial variations of canop
✍ S. Shimoda; T. Oikawa πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2006 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 535 KB

## Abstract This study discusses the photosynthetic pathway types involved in canopy temperature measurements on a mixed grassland consisting of C~3~ and C~4~ plants (dominant species in biomass were __Solidago altissima__ (C~3~), __Miscanthus sinensis__ (C~4~), and __Imperata cylindrica__ (C~4~)).