## Abstract Temporal changes in gene expression were measured using DNA microarrays after 30‐min or 2‐hr transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAo) in rats. Total RNA was extracted from the injured hemisphere at 30 min, 4 hr, 8 hr, 24 hr, 3 days, and 7 days after MCAo for GeneChip analysis u
Changes in gene expression following induction of ischemic tolerance in rat brain: Detection and verification
✍ Scribed by Maria L. Wrang; Flemming Møller; Carsten W. Alsbo; Nils H. Diemer
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2001
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 101 KB
- Volume
- 65
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0360-4012
- DOI
- 10.1002/jnr.1127
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Tolerance against ischemic insults can be elicited in the CA1 region of rat hippocampus by inducing a short ischemic period 2–3 days prior to the ischemic insult. To detect genes whose expression changes following induction of ischemic tolerance (IT), we applied a differential display technique called restriction fragment differential display‐PCR (RFDD‐PCR). RFDD‐PCR displays the coding region of mRNA and allows detection of differentially expressed mRNA. Double‐stranded cDNA generated using a T~25~V primer is digested by the endonuclease __Taq__I, and adapters are ligated onto the cDNA fragments. When amplifying the adapter‐containing cDNA fragments under high‐stringency conditions, reproducible PCR profiles are obtained. By comparing these profiles from naïve and ischemia‐tolerant rat brains statistically, significant expression changes of 20 fragments were identified. To verify the observed changes, quantitative PCR and in situ hybridization were performed for three fragments representing proteins with quite different functions (GluR2‐flop, SC1, and p68 RNA helicase). Quantitative PCR displayed the same degree of regulation as RFDD‐PCR, but in situ hybridization did not display any regulation. As the applied PCR‐based techniques detect only polyadenylated mRNA, whereas in situ hybridization detects both nonadenylated and adenylated mRNA, changes in the polyadenylation state of the mRNA, rather than inconsistent changes in the total amount of mRNA, probably explain this discrepancy. Thus, our results show that the expression of genes hitherto not related to IT changes with the induction of IT and that the degree of regulation displayed by RFDD‐PCR can be verified by quantitative PCR. J. Neurosci. Res. 65:54–58, 2001. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES