๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Changes in Dietary Guidance: Implications for Food and Nutrient Databases

โœ Scribed by Suzanne P. Murphy


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2001
Tongue
English
Weight
281 KB
Volume
14
Category
Article
ISSN
0889-1575

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Two types of dietary guidance for Americans have recently been released, and both have important implications for the way data are organized on food and nutrient databases. New dietary reference intakes (DRIs) have been set for 17 nutrients, and in several cases the units for these recommendations do not match those traditionally carried on nutrient databases. Furthermore, some of the tolerable upper intake levels (ULs) are speci"ed only for supplemental and forti"cation forms of nutrients, which necessitates calculating separate intake values for nutrients from foods and nutrients that are added to foods or taken as supplements. The year 2000 revision of the Dietary Guidelines for Americans also suggest new ways to evaluate dietary intakes: there is an increased emphasis on obtaining an appropriate number of servings from food groups such as fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and lowfat dairy products. To allow users of nutrient databases to provide relevant evaluations of dietary data, developers will need to consider carrying a much larger array of variables in order to calculate intakes of folate in folate equivalents, vitamin E as alpha-tocopherol (not as alpha-tocopherol equivalents), nutrients occurring in foods versus added or supplemental nutrients, and the number of servings from a variety of food groups.

For more information on the DRIs, see: www.nap.edu. For more information on the year 2000 Dietary Guidelines, see: www.usda.gov/cnpp 2001 Academic Press


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Dietary Reference Intakes for the U.S. a
โœ Suzanne P. Murphy ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2002 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 110 KB

New Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) for the United States and Canada have recently been set for 31 nutrients, and are likely to be of interest to health professionals in other countries as well. In several cases, the units for these recommendations do not match those traditionally carried on nutrie