The viral genotype may influence the response to interferon sion and more efficient antiviral immune response, is still (IFN) treatment in chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. unclear. To characterize potential mechanisms responsible for this ef-Several factors including viral load, disease se
Change in hepatitis C virus genotype in hemodialysis patients after end-of-treatment response to interferon monotherapy—relapse or re-infection?
✍ Scribed by Teresa C. Arrais; Sonia Van Dooren; Anne-Mieke Vandamme; Christian Brechot; Francois Rimlinger; Antonio Eduardo Silva; Renata M. Perez; Maria Lucia G. Ferraz; Valerie Thiers
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2007
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 128 KB
- Volume
- 80
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0146-6615
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection remains common among hemodialysis patients and its occurrence is related mainly to nosocomial spread. Although dialysis patients with HCV infection respond well to interferon‐based therapy, relapse is frequent. This study aimed at a selected group of hemodialysis patients infected with HCV infection undergoing interferon therapy who achieved end‐of‐treatment virological response but became HCV‐RNA positive again 6 months after end‐of‐treatment. It was evaluated whether de novo HCV‐RNA positivity in these non‐sustained responders occurred due to lack of clearance of HCV after the initial response to interferon‐alpha (relapse) or due to re‐infection with a new strain (re‐infection). Genotyping by Inno‐LiPA and by phylogenetic tree analysis using partial HCV‐NS5B sequences at two evaluation points: pre‐treatment (T0) and 6 months after end‐of‐treatment (T18). Non‐sustained responders (n = 15) carried subtypes 1a (8 patients), 1b (4 patients), 3a (2 patients), and 4a (1 patient) before treatment. Identical subtypes were detected in 10 patients at T18. Five patients changed genotypes at T18, suggesting nosocomial re‐infection. This study emphasizes the importance of epidemiologic measures to control the re‐exposure of hemodialysis patients treated previously for HCV infection. J. Med. Virol. 80:80–86, 2008. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract The efficacy of interferon (IFN) monotherapy for non‐responders to pegylated interferon (PEG‐IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV) combination therapy is still unclear. To evaluate the impact of IFN monotherapy on biochemical response, 200 consecutive patients infected with HCV genotype 1b, who rec
In hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes 2 and 3 patients, the high rate of relapse after 12 to 16 weeks of antiviral therapy is the main concern for shortening treatment duration. This study was undertaken to delineate predictors of relapse after short treatment in patients with undetectable HCV RNA at
## Abstract The interferon sensitivity‐determining region (ISDR) is useful as a predictive marker of the response to interferon (IFN) therapy for chronic hepatitis patients with a Japan‐specific subtype (J‐type) of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1b. This marker is not useful for predicting respon
We read with great interest the recent report by Li et al. 1 analyzing the correlation between the clusters of differentiation 24 (CD24) polymorphism and risk of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. In their study, the CD24 P170 T allele (thymidine at position 170) was correlated with a strong