๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Challenges in practicing deliberative democratic evaluation

โœ Scribed by Jennifer C. Greene


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2000
Tongue
English
Weight
823 KB
Volume
2000
Category
Article
ISSN
1097-6736

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Deliberative democratic evaluation
โœ Ernest R. House; Kenneth R. Howe ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2000 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 545 KB
Responsive evaluation (and its influence
โœ Ernest R. House ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2001 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 44 KB

## Abstract In the 1970s Stake offered a rationale for representing the perspectives of stakeholders, which was liberating and highly influential, though his insistence that evaluative claims are subjective left responsive evaluators in an arbitrary posture.

Democratizing evaluation: Meanings and m
โœ Katherine E. Ryan; Trav D. Johnson ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2000 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 742 KB

## Abstract The way in which participation is constructed by the evaluator and perceived by the participants was found to influence evaluation impact.

Practicing what we preach: Democratic pr
โœ Bruce L. Mallory ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2010 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons โš– 45 KB

## Abstract Strategies for moving closer to effective forms of shared governance, using deliberative approaches that sustain faculty authority over the academic mission.

Ethical challenges of practicing in rura
โœ James L. Werth Jr.; Sarah L. Hastings; Ruth Riding-Malon ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2010 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 117 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

## Abstract Mental health professionals practicing in rural areas face ethical dilemmas different from those experienced by their urban counterparts and may find that the existing ethics literature and American Psychological Association (APA, 2002) ethics code not particularly helpful. We highlight