Centralized versus peer-to-peer knowledge management systems
✍ Scribed by Ronald Maier; Thomas Hädrich
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2006
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 238 KB
- Volume
- 13
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1092-4604
- DOI
- 10.1002/kpm.244
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
The term knowledge management system (KMS) has been used widely to denote information and communication technologies in support of knowledge management. However, so far investigations about the notion of KMS, their functions and architecture as well as the differences to other types of systems remain on an abstract level. This paper reviews the literature on KMS and distills a number of characteristics concerning the specifics of knowledge to be managed, the platform metaphor, advanced services, KM instruments, supported processes, participants and goals of their application. The paper then presents two ideal architectures for KMS, a centralized and a peer‐to‐peer architecture, discusses their differences with the help of two example systems and suggests that each of these architectures fits a different type of KM initiative. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Peer‐to‐peer (P2P) applications are rapidly gaining acceptance among users of Internet‐based services, especially because of their capability of exchanging resources while preserving the anonymity of both requesters and providers. However, concerns have been raised about the possibility
This special issue of the journal Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience is intended to call further attention to Peer-to-Peer (P2P) systems. P2P systems are decentralized, selforganizing distributed systems that cooperate to exchange data. These systems have emerged as the dominant co