✦ LIBER ✦

Central difference solutions of the kinematic model of settling of polydisperse suspensions and three-dimensional particle-scale simulations

✍ Scribed by R. Bürger; K.-K. Fjelde; K. Höfler; K. Hvistendahl Karlsen

Book ID: 110307940
Publisher: Springer
Year: 2001
Tongue: English
Weight: 195 KB
Volume: 41
Category: Article
ISSN: 0022-0833
DOI: 10.1023/a:1011960718366

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Development and validation of a three-di

Development and validation of a three-dimensional kinematic model for the McPherson steering and suspension mechanisms

✍ Daniel A. Mántaras; Pablo Luque; Carlos Vera 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 453 KB

Three-dimensional kinematics and dynamic

Three-dimensional kinematics and dynamics of the foot during walking: a model of central control mechanisms

✍ Yasuhiro Osaki; Mikhail Kunin; Bernard Cohen; Theodore Raphan 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 Springer-Verlag 🌐 English ⚖ 794 KB

Three-dimensional numerical simulation o

Three-dimensional numerical simulation of the deposition of polydisperse aerosol particles on filter fibres — extended concept and preliminary results

✍ Hanspeter Baumgartner; Friedrich Löffler 📂 Article 📅 1987 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 509 KB

Models of sub-grid variability in numeri

Models of sub-grid variability in numerical simulations of solute transport in heterogeneous porous formations: three-dimensional flow and effect of pore-scale dispersion

✍ A. Bellin; A. E. Lawrence; Y. Rubin 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 389 KB

Differences in the lower troposphere in

Differences in the lower troposphere in two- and three-dimensional cloud-resolving model simulations of deep convection

✍ J. C. Petch; P. N. Blossey; C .S. Bretherton 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 132 KB

## Abstract This short note discusses key deficiencies in two‐dimensional (2D) cloud‐resolving model (CRM) simulations. Results differ significantly from three‐dimensional (3D) simulations in the low‐level humidity structure and associated fields. These differences are consistent across two differe