Cell proliferation as a long-term prognostic factor in diffuse large-cell lymphomas
β Scribed by Rosella Silvestrini; Aurora Costa; Patrizia Boracchi; Roberto Giardini; Franco Rilke
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1993
- Tongue
- French
- Weight
- 594 KB
- Volume
- 54
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0020-7136
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
The relevance of cell proliferation rate-defined as the 3H-thymidine labeling index CH-dT LI)-in predicting response to treatment (complete remission, CR), freedom from progression (FFP) and overall survival ( 0 s ) was evaluated in 86 patients with diffuse large-cell lymphoma (DLCL). The biologic variable was not associated with most of the established clinical factors, such as gender and age of the patient, performance status, 0 symptoms, tumor bulk, or extranodal disease, but was directly related to stage. 3H-dT LI significantly predicted short-and long-term clinical outcome. In fact, more patients with slowly proliferating DLCL reached CR and had longer median FFP and 0 s than patients with rapidly proliferating DLCL. Multipleregression analysis to evaluate the relative contribution of the different biologic and clinical variables in predicting CR, FFP and 0 s showed that 3H-dT LI and Ann Arbor stage were the only 2 stable factors, which retained their prognostic significance even in the presence of other conventional factors, and that 'H-dT LI was the most powerful as an indicator of risk of death in DLCL patients.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract ## BACKGROUND We present the results of doxorubicinβbased chemotherapy with or without involvedβfield radiotherapy for patients with diffuse large Bβcell lymphoma (DLBCL) according to the international prognostic index (IPI). ## METHODS From September 1988 through December 1996, 294
## Abstract Diffuse large Bβcell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a biologically heterogeneous disease for which the current approach to treatment is only successful for 50% of patients. The prognostic value of various clinical and biological factors in predicting treatment outcome is discussed in this paper. A