A mathematical model is proposed to explain the observed internalization of microspheres and 3 H-thymidine labelled cells in steady-state multicellular spheroids. The model uses the conventional ideas of nutrient diffusion and consumption by the cells. In addition, a very simple model of the progres
Cell migration in multicell spheroids: Swimming against the tide
β Scribed by D.L.S. McElwain; G.J. Pettet
- Publisher
- Springer
- Year
- 1993
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 881 KB
- Volume
- 55
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1522-9602
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Multicell spheroids, small spherical clusters of cancer cells, have become an important in vitro model for studying tumour development given the diffusion limited geometry associated with many solid tumour growths. Spheroids expand until they reach a dormant state where they exhibit a grossly static three-layered structure. However, at a cellular level, the spheroid is demonstrably dynamic with constituent cells migrating from the outer well-nourished region of the spheroid toward the necrotic central core. The mechanism that drives the migrating cells in the spheroid is not well understood. In this paper we demonstrate that recent experiments on internationalization can be adequately described by implicating pressure gradients caused by differential cell proliferation and cell death as the primary mechanism. Although chemotaxis plays a role in cell movement, we argue that it acts against the passive movement caused by pressure differences.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Chemotaxis in bacteria is an excellent model for signal transduction processes. In Agrobacterium tumefaciens, the causative agent of crown gall tumour on wounded plants, it is a vital part of the organism's biology. A chromosomally-determined chemotaxis system causes the bacterium to be attracted in
## Abstract The present study compared MuslimβArab women in Israel who initiated divorce (__n__=45) with those who stayed in stressful marital relationships (__n__=46). Based on an ecological approach and using a crossβsectional design, we explored the differences between the two groups with regard