Cefotaxime in the treatment of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis
β Scribed by X Xiol; J Ariza
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1996
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 131 KB
- Volume
- 23
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0270-9139
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
In a recently published report, Rimola et al. compared Gudiol F. Aztreonam vs cefotaxime in the treatment of gramtwo different dosages of cefotaxime (CTX) in the treatnegative spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. HEPATOLOGY 1991;14: 91-98. ment of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP). 1 They 3. Craig WA, Ebert SC. Continuous infusion of b-lactam antibiotics.
concluded that 2 g every 12 hours (group II) is similar
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
We read with interest the study of Nousbaum and colleagues, which reported a low sensitivity of the Multistix 8 reagent strip in the diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP). It is noteworthy that overall prevalence of SBP in this study was only 5.5%, significantly lower than in all pre
Patients with bacterial overgrowth of the small intestine developed spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) more frequently than patients without bacterial overgrowth of the small intestine. The objective of this study was to determine whether the incidences of small intestine dysmotility and bacter
Fifty-six patients with alcoholic cirrhosis and ascites were studied. The ascitic fluid was analyzed for pH, POz, PCO2, glucose, protein, specific gravity, amylase, lactic dehydrogenase, white blood cell count, polymorphonuclear count, and cytology. It was also cultured aerobically and anaerobically
Samples of peripheral and portal blood as well as ascitic fluid were Supported by a grant of the FISss (NΠ 91/0675) of the Spanish National Institute of cultured by immediate inoculation into blood culture bottles (Bactec Health.