CCAS: an intelligent decision support system for credit card assessment
✍ Scribed by Nikolaos F. Matsatsinis
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2002
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 431 KB
- Volume
- 11
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1057-9214
- DOI
- 10.1002/mcda.329
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
During the last two decades credit cards have became one of the main ways for accomplishing financial transactions. The number of credit card owners have increased rapidly. Unfortunately, at the same time the cases where the owners cannot fulfil their obligations to the banks have also been increased. This fact forced credit institutions and banks to search for methodologies that will allow them to accurately evaluate the credibility of each credit card applicant. Multi‐criteria decision aid methods as well as machine learning algorithms can be used to accomplish this task. The present paper proposes a new intelligent decision support system for credit card evaluation, based on a machine‐learning algorithm, namely the Composite Rule Induction System and the Rough Sets. The major advantage of the algorithm and the system is the incorporation of qualitative variables, which have an essential role in credit card evaluation. The system is applied on a real case study concerning credit card evaluation by a leading Greek commercial bank and the obtained results are compared to the results of multi‐criteria decision aid methods as well as other machine learning algorithms. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
The last decade bears witness to an exponential growth in the use of the World Wide Web. As a result, a huge number of documents are accessible online through search engines, whose patternmatching capabilities have turned out to be useful for mining the Web space as a particular kind of linguistic c
conducted: an unstructured stage based on the analyst's knowledge of psychological theory, and a structured stage to evaluate two recently-developed human reliability analysis techniques. In general, the structured techniques required less effort to produce results comparable with those of the unstr
conducted: an unstructured stage based on the analyst's knowledge of psychological theory, and a structured stage to evaluate two recently-developed human reliability analysis techniques. In general, the structured techniques required less effort to produce results comparable with those of the unstr