## Abstract A lack of appreciation of Kenyan farmers' knowledge and their perceptions of soil erosion and soil conservation measures was the reason for low adoption of recommended technologies. This research was carried out to identify the criteria that farmers used to distinguish farm‐types and to
Catchment-level evaluation of farmers' estimates of soil erosion and crop yield in the Central Highlands of Kenya
✍ Scribed by B.O. Okoba; G. Sterk
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2010
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 289 KB
- Volume
- 21
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1085-3278
- DOI
- 10.1002/ldr.1003
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Soil and water conservation programmes in Kenya were not always successful due to experts' negligence of the role of farmers in problem identification and conservation planning. Using farmers' knowledge of soil surface morphology to assess soil productivity may stimulate farmers to participate in solving the prevailing problems. The objective of this study was to compare farmers' soil erosion and crop yield estimations with a conventional science approach in a small (∼550 ha) catchment in the Central Highlands of Kenya. Farmers' knowledge and perceptions of the effect of topsoil erosion features was used to assess the soil erosion status across the catchment area. The conventional scientific approach used a survey methodology and GIS‐based up‐scaling to quantify soil erosion patterns. In addition, the farmers made qualitative estimations of crop yield losses, which were verified through actual crop yield measurements. The soil erosion pattern between the farmers and conventional science approaches showed a strong agreement at the hillslope scale, while at the catchment scale the agreement was slightly weaker. Farmers observed more area under nearly flat and gentle slopes to have high erosion than the area approximated by the conventional science approach. Farmers' prediction of crop yields loss in each erosion class showed no difference with the actual field measurements. Despite use of farmers' mapping of erosion pattern being participatory, thereby stimulating awareness creation on land degradation processes, it can be labour intensive and a slower approach than the conventional science approach in evaluating catchment‐scale erosion patterns. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Development of improved soil erosion and sediment yield prediction technology is required to provide catchment stakeholders with the tools they need to evaluate the impact of various management strategies on soil loss and sediment yield in order to plan for the optimal use of the land.
## Abstract Despite several approaches that aimed at mobilising East African farmers to embrace soil and water conservation (SWC) activities, farmers hardly responded since they were seldom involved in the planning of SWC activities. Two tools that employ farmers' participation were developed and a