Cataract, pattern stimulation and visually evoked potentials
โ Scribed by G. H. M. Lith; W. Hekkert-Wiebenga
- Publisher
- Springer-Verlag
- Year
- 1983
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 280 KB
- Volume
- 55
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0012-4486
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Visually evoked potentials on pattern stimulation are lowered by cataracts via scatter, absorption and defocusing. These effects have to be known before pattern stimulation can be fruitfully applied in patients when a lowered vision cannot or can hardly be explained by the cataract. It was remarkable that pattern responses weie relatively good as compared to visual acuity. With a pattern of 80' check size and 80% contrast all patients with a visual acuity of more than 0.1 had recognizable responses; this holds also true with 40' check size and 40% contrast in all patients with a visual acuity of more than 0.3. Reversely, with 10' check size and 10% contrast only half of the normal subjects had detectable responses.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
We describe three patients with central areolar choroidal dystrophy whose electroretinograms (ERGs) and pattern visually evoked cortical potentials (VECPs) confirmed their macular dysfunction. Visual fields measured by Goldmann perimetry showed central relative scotomata corresponding to a dystrophi
This study reports the pattern visual evoked potential (PVEP) findings in 10 patients with idiopathic hypothyroidism. Eight of these patients also had pattern electroretinography (PERG) performed and six were additionally seen after treatment with thyroxine. Only one patient had definitely abnormal
Cataract patients suspected of having disease which might interfere with good postoperative visual function were referred for evaluation. Monocular steady-state luminance visual evoked potentials (VEPs) were elicited with closed eyes at a stimulus rate of 10 flashes/sec. VEPs were rated as either no
Twenty-one eyes of thirteen patients suffering from optic neuritis were examined with the Octopus automated perimeter and pattern visually evoked cortical potentials. All eyes had visual acuity of 0.2 or better. Visual field examination was measured by program 31 or 33, which tests the central 30-de