This essay focuses on how casuistry can become a useful technique of practical reasoning for the clinical ethicist or ethics consultant. Casuistry is defined, its relationship to rhetorical reasoning and its interpretation of cases, by employing three terms that, while they are not employed by the c
โฆ LIBER โฆ
Casuistry and clinical ethics
โ Scribed by Albert R. Jonsen
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Year
- 1986
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 857 KB
- Volume
- 7
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1573-1200
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
For the last century, moral philosophy has stressed theory for the analysis of moral argument and concepts. In the last decade, interest in the ethical issues of health care has stimulated attention to cases and particular instances. This has revealed the gap between ethical theory and practice. This article reviews the history and method of casuistry which for many centuries provided an approach to practical ethics. Its strengths and weaknesses are noted and its potential for contemporary use explored.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
Casuistry as methodology in clinical eth
โ
Albert R. Jonsen
๐
Article
๐
1991
๐
Springer Netherlands
๐
English
โ 842 KB
Casuistry: A Complement to Principle Eth
โ
Stephen J. Freeman; Perry C. Francis
๐
Article
๐
2006
๐
American Counseling Association
๐
English
โ 65 KB
Ethics and clinical trials
โ
P. Goyot
๐
Article
๐
1992
๐
Elsevier Science
๐
English
โ 151 KB
Ethics and clinical practice
โ
R. Gillon
๐
Article
๐
1988
๐
Springer
๐
English
โ 447 KB
Clinical Ethics: Theory and Practice
๐
Article
๐
1990
๐
Springer
๐
English
โ 174 KB
Providing clinical ethics consultation
โ
Evan G. DeRenzo
๐
Article
๐
1994
๐
Springer
๐
English
โ 385 KB