## Ward n informal survey of industry participants during the summer of 1987 found that A the delivery specifications of the live cattle futures contract continue to represent an area of concern. Industry participants identified the following real or perceived delivery problems with the live cattl
Cash settlement as an alternative settlement mechanism for the live hog futures contract
โ Scribed by Kevin L. Kimle; Marvin L. Hayenga
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1994
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 818 KB
- Volume
- 14
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0270-7314
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
The use of cash settlement as a method of settling futures contracts is a relatively new concept [ Rowsell and Purcell ( 1990)]. Historically, futures contracts were for commodities, and actual delivery was the most logical means of linking the futures contract with its underlying commodity. With the development of financial futures, however, alternative means of settlement began to emerge.
Cash settlement was first used for Eurodollar and stock futures contracts in 198 1. Soon thereafter proposals involving cash settlement as an alternative to physical delivery began to emerge for agricultural futures markets. Currently the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) live hog futures contract uses a physical delivery settlement. It allows delivery of 40,000 pounds of hogs meeting various weight and grade specifications at any one of seven (previously eight) alternative terminal markets as a means of settlement.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
urrently pending before the Commodity Futures Trading Commission are C proposals from several exchanges for contract designation to trade equity futures contracts. Several of these proposals, including those submitted by the CME, COMEX, and NYFE, are based on a diversified common stock index. Equit