Cardiac MRI to investigate myocardial scar and coronary venous anatomy using a slow infusion of dimeglumine gadobenate in patients undergoing assessment for cardiac resynchronization therapy
✍ Scribed by Simon G. Duckett; Amedeo Chiribiri; Matthew R. Ginks; Stephen Sinclair; Benjamin R. Knowles; Rene Botnar; Gerry S. Carr-White; Christopher A. Rinaldi; Eike Nagel; Reza Razavi; Tobias Schaeffter
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2010
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 596 KB
- Volume
- 33
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1053-1807
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate a cardiac MR (CMR) examination with slow infusion of a high‐relaxivity contrast agent to visualize coronary venous anatomy (CVA) and myocardial scar in heart failure patients awaiting cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
Materials and Methods
Fourteen patients awaiting CRT (seven ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) and seven non‐ICM) and two with normal LV function underwent CMR on a 1.5 Tesla (T) MR scanner. Dimeglumine‐gadobenate was slowly infused. Bolus arrival in the LV was measured by a dynamic electrocardiogram (ECG) ‐triggered inversion recovery (IR) scan subsequent to starting an ECG‐triggered respiratory‐navigated three‐dimensional (3D) SSFP MR scan with IR preparation to acquire systolic whole‐heart anatomy for vein visualization. Delayed contrast‐enhanced MR scan was performed to assess myocardial scar. CVA obtained by CMR was compared with X‐ray venography in 11 patients. CVA and scar were segmented and registered for visual inspection.
Results
For all subjects, there was excellent visualization of the CVA. All ICM and one non‐ICM patient showed scar. There was excellent correlation between veins seen by CMR and venography.
Conclusion
We have demonstrated that slow infusion protocol of dimeglumine‐gadobenate can be used to assess both CVA and myocardial scar in a single MR examination. Furthermore, an image overlay technique has been used to show the relationship of scar to the CVA. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2011;33:87–95. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.