✦ LIBER ✦

Capturing Judgment Policies in Performance Rating

✍ Scribed by ROBERT L. TAYLOR; WILLIAM D. WILSTED

Book ID: 115239773
Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 1976
Tongue: English
Weight: 511 KB
Volume: 15
Category: Article
ISSN: 0019-8676
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-232x.1976.tb01118.x

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

A Multivariate Methodology for Simultane

A Multivariate Methodology for Simultaneously Capturing and Clustering Judgment Policies

✍ Louis W. Glorfeld; George C. Fowler 📂 Article 📅 1988 🏛 Decision Sciences Institute, Georgia State Univers 🌐 English ⚖ 951 KB

Setting Standards for Complex Performanc

Setting Standards for Complex Performances: An Iterative, Judgmental Policy capturing Strategy

✍ Richard M. Jaeger 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 649 KB

Consistency of rating accuracy and ratin

Consistency of rating accuracy and rating errors in the judgment of human performance

✍ Walter C. Borman 📂 Article 📅 1977 🏛 Elsevier Science ⚖ 932 KB

Judgments About Sexism: A Policy Capturi

Judgments About Sexism: A Policy Capturing Approach

✍ Curtis R. Brant; Clifford R. Mynatt; Michael E. Doherty 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 Springer US 🌐 English ⚖ 244 KB

Policy capturing models for multi-facete

Policy capturing models for multi-faceted relevance judgments

✍ Xiaoli Huang; Ryen W. White 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 Wiley (John Wiley & Sons) 🌐 English ⚖ 163 KB

## Abstract We applied policy capturing and bootstrapping methods to investigate the relevance judgment process, with a particular focus on understanding how judges summarize an overall relevance judgment from five specific aspects of relevance. Our data come from relevance judgments made in the de

The impact of non-performance informatio

The impact of non-performance information on ratings of job performance: A policy-capturing approach

✍ Jeffrey R. Spence; Lisa M. Keeping 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 158 KB

## Abstract Researchers have suggested that rater motives and the organizational context should be considered as sources of performance appraisal inaccuracies. A review of the performance appraisal literature revealed three primary non‐performance factors that managers consider when rating employee