๐”– Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

๐Ÿ“

Can't Have It Both Ways


Publisher
www.fanfiction.net
Year
2009
Category
Fiction

โฌ‡  Acquire This Volume

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Having it Both Ways
โœ Tasha L. Harrison ๐Ÿ“‚ Fiction ๐Ÿ“… 2021 ๐Ÿ› Tasha L. Harrison ๐ŸŒ English

<p><strong>"I thought I knew how to be alone..."</strong></p><p> </p><p>In the wake of her break up with Elijah Weinstein, Yves seems to have forgotten everything she ever learned. Boys and booze don't fill that emptiness as easily as it had before and as depression threatens to take her under she t

God, Chance and Purpose: Can God Have It
โœ David J. Bartholomew ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2008 ๐Ÿ› Cambridge University Press ๐ŸŒ English

Scientific accounts of existence give chance a central role. At the smallest level, quantum theory involves uncertainty and evolution is driven by chance and necessity. These ideas do not fit easily with theology in which chance has been seen as the enemy of purpose. One option is to argue, as propo

God, Chance and Purpose: Can God Have It
โœ David J. Bartholomew ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2008 ๐Ÿ› Cambridge University Press ๐ŸŒ English

The book explores the role of such ideas as probabilities, chance, randomness, and purpose, to approach the existence of God. Essentially, the thesis is that chance or determinism are not directly linked with the presence of God. The statistical explanations are interesting, but the book is flawed o

God, Chance and Purpose: Can God Have It
โœ David J. Bartholomew ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2008 ๐Ÿ› Cambridge University Press ๐ŸŒ English

Scientific accounts of existence give chance a central role. At the smallest level, quantum theory involves uncertainty and evolution is driven by chance and necessity. These ideas do not fit easily with theology in which chance has been seen as the enemy of purpose. One option is to argue, as propo

Having It Both Ways: Hybrid Theories and
โœ Guy Fletcher, Michael Ridge ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2014 ๐Ÿ› Oxford University Press ๐ŸŒ English

A recent trend in metaethics has been to reject the apparent choice between pure cognitivism, where moral (and other normative) judgments are understood as representational or belief-like states, and pure non-cognitivism, where they are understood as non-representational or desire-like states. Rathe