Cancer surgery: risks and opportunities
β Scribed by J.C. Coffey; M.J.F. Smith; J.H. Wang; D. Bouchier-Hayes; T.G. Cotter; H.P. Redmond
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2006
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 100 KB
- Volume
- 28
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0265-9247
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
In the recent past, several papers have pointed to the possibility that tumour removal generates a permissive environment in which tumour growth is potentiated. This phenomenon has been coined βperioperative tumour growthβ and whilst it represents a departure in terms of our attitude to the surgical process, this concept was first hinted at by Paget1Sir James Paget (1814β1899) was a surgeon and physiologist who is widely held (along with Rudolph Virchow) to be the father of the science of pathology. Paget described Paget's disease of the nipple as well as Paget's disease of bone.
himself. Despite this, the time interval immediately before and after cancer surgery (i.e. the perioperative period) remains an underutilised interval during which chemotherapeutic regimens are rarely implemented. Herein, we present a summarised review of the literature that supports the concept that tumour removal may potentiate the growth of residual neoplastic disease. We also outline current knowledge regarding underlying mechanisms and in this manner highlight potential therapeutic entry points. Finally, we emphasise the urgent need for trials of agents that could protect patients against the harmful hostβtumour interactions that may occur during the perioperative period. BioEssays 28: 433β437, 2006. Β© 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Risk of breast cancer was assessed in relationship to gynecologic operations using data from a record-linkage study involving 15,844 women in the Uppsala Health Care Region of Sweden, who underwent surgery between 1965 and 1983. Data abstracted from medical records for the breast cancer cases and a