𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Cancer risk among Danish women with cosmetic breast implants

✍ Scribed by Søren Friis; Lisbet R. Hölmich; Joseph K. McLaughlin; Kim Kjøller; Jon P. Fryzek; Trine F. Henriksen; Jørgen H. Olsen


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2005
Tongue
French
Weight
89 KB
Volume
118
Category
Article
ISSN
0020-7136

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

The available epidemiologic evidence does not support a carcinogenic effect of silicone breast implants on breast or other cancers. Data on cancer risk other than breast cancer are limited and few studies have assessed cancer risk beyond 10–15 years after breast implantation. We extended follow‐up of our earlier cohort study of Danish women with cosmetic breast implants by 7 years, yielding 30 years of follow‐up for women with longest implant duration. The study population consisted of women who underwent cosmetic breast implant surgery at private clinics of plastic surgery (n = 1,653) or public hospitals (n = 1,110), and a control group of women who attended private clinics for other plastic surgery (n = 1,736), between 1973–95. Cancer incidence through 2002 was ascertained using the Danish Cancer Registry. Risk evaluation was based on computation of standardized incidence ratios (SIR) and Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for age, calendar period and reproductive history. We observed 163 cancers among women with breast implants compared to 136.7 expected based on general population rates (SIR = 1.2; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.0–1.4), during a mean follow‐up period of 14.4 years (range = 0–30 years). Women with breast implants experienced a reduced risk of breast cancer (SIR = 0.7; 95% CI = 0.5–1.0), and an increased risk of non‐melanoma skin cancer (SIR = 2.1; 95% CI = 1.5–2.7). Stratification by age at implantation, calendar year at implantation and time since implantation showed no clear trends, however, the statistical precision was limited in these analyses. When excluding non‐melanoma skin cancer, the SIR for cancer overall was 1.0 (95% CI = 0.8–1.2). With respect to other site‐specific cancers, no significantly increased or decreased SIR were observed. Similar results were found when directly comparing women who had implants at private clinics with women who attended private clinics for other plastic surgery, with rate ratios for cancer overall, breast cancer and non‐melanoma skin cancer of 1.1 (95% CI = 0.8–1.6), 0.7 (95% CI = 0.4–1.3) and 1.5 (95% CI = 0.8–2.7), respectively. In conclusion, our study lends further support to the accumulating evidence that silicone breast implants are not carcinogenic. Reasons for the consistently reported deficit of breast cancer among women with breast implants remain unclear, whereas increased exposure to sunlight may explain the excess occurrence of non‐melanoma skin cancer. We found no indication of delayed diagnosis of breast cancer due to the presence of breast implants. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Cancer among Scandinavian women with cos
✍ Loren Lipworth; Robert E. Tarone; Søren Friis; Weimin Ye; Jørgen H. Olsen; Olof 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 French ⚖ 66 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract No increased risks of specific types of cancer following breast implantation have been consistently reported, but data on risk beyond 15 years are limited. We have pooled the results of 2 nationwide cohort studies of 3,486 Swedish and 2,736 Danish women who underwent cosmetic breast imp

Risk of second cancer among women with b
✍ Lene Mellemkjær; Søren Friis; Jørgen H. Olsen; Ghislaine Scélo; Kari Hemminki; E 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 French ⚖ 111 KB 👁 2 views

## Abstract A large number of women survive a diagnosis of breast cancer. Knowledge of their risk of developing a new primary cancer is important not only in relation to potential side effects of their cancer treatment, but also in relation to the possibility of shared etiology with other types of

Risk for breast cancer among women with
✍ Lisbeth Bertelsen; Lene Mellemkjær; Kirsten Frederiksen; Susanne K Kjær; Louise 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 French ⚖ 80 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract Although several risk factors are common to endometriosis and breast cancer, the results of observational studies of an association have so far been inconsistent. We evaluated the relationship between endometriosis and breast cancer on the basis of data on selected cancers and medical h

Occupational risk factors for breast can
✍ Sandra A. Petralia; Wong-Ho Chow; Joseph McLaughlin; Fan Jin; Yu-Tang Gao; Musta 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 75 KB 👁 2 views

Although female breast cancer rates are lower in China than in Western countries, rates have been rising rapidly in China. This increase may be due to changes in established breast cancer risk factors, but it is possible that exposure to occupational and environmental carcinogens in Shanghai also ha

Environmental risk factors for breast ca
✍ Mary S. Wolff; Julie A. Britton; Valerie P. Wilson 📂 Article 📅 2002 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 231 KB 👁 1 views

There are few unequivocably established environmental carcinogens for breast cancer in women. Nevertheless, environmental factors are believed to explain much of the international variation in breast cancer risk and possibly differences among racial/ethnic groups. Along with lifestyle, some adverse

Risk factors for breast cancer among Fil
✍ Lorna J. Gibson; Clarisse Héry; Nicolas Mitton; Abigail Gines-Bautista; D Maxwel 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 French ⚖ 124 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract Age‐adjusted incidence rates of breast cancer vary greatly worldwide with highest rates found in the typically ‘westernised’ countries of North America and Europe. Much lower rates are observed in Asian and African populations but an exception to this has been reported for the Manila Ca