𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?

✍ Scribed by Einstein, A. (author);Podolsky, B. (author);Rosen, N. (author)

Book ID
111672713
Publisher
The American Physical Society
Year
1935
Tongue
English
Weight
258 KB
Volume
47
Category
Article
ISSN
0031-899X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis

of lanthanum is 7/2, hence the nuclear magnetic moment as determined by this analysis is 2.5 nuclear magnetons. This is in fair agreement with the value 2.8 nuclear magnetons determined, from La III hyperfine structures by the writer and N. S. Grace. 9 ' M. F. Crawford and N. S. Grace, Phys. Rev. 4'7, 536 (1935).This investigation was carried out under the supervision of Professor G. Breit, and, I wish to thank him for the invaluable advice and assistance so freely given. I also take this opportunity to acknowledge the award of a Fellowship by the Royal Society of Canada, and to thank the University of Wisconsin and the Department of Physics for the privilege of working here.

πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

[SpringerBriefs in Physics] Niels Bohr a
[SpringerBriefs in Physics] Niels Bohr and Complementarity Volume 139 || 1935. β€œCan Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?”: The EPR Experiment and Complementarity
✍ Plotnitsky, Arkady πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2012 πŸ› Springer New York 🌐 English βš– 378 KB

This book offers a discussion of Niels Bohr’s conception of β€œcomplementarity,” arguably his greatest contribution to physics and philosophy. By tracing Bohr’s work from his 1913 atomic theory to the introduction and then refinement of the idea of complementarity, and by explicating different meaning

Can the decoherent histories description
Can the decoherent histories description of reality be considered satisfactory?
✍ Angelo Bassi; GianCarlo Ghirardi πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 122 KB

We discuss some features of the decoherent histories approach. We consider four assumptions, the first three being in our opinion necessary for a sound interpretation of the theory, while the fourth one is accepted by the supporters of the DH approach, and we prove that they lead to a logical contra