## Abstract The circular dichroism of double‐helical nucleic acids was calculated as a function of geometry using the theory of Tinoco and Johnson. This theory does not include contributions of near ultraviolet transitions that are not π → π\* in nature. The calculated circular dichroism shows a st
Calculations of the circular dichroism of double-helical nucleic acids. II. Effects involving n → π* transitions
✍ Scribed by David S. Studdert; Robert C. Davis
- Publisher
- Wiley (John Wiley & Sons)
- Year
- 1974
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 725 KB
- Volume
- 13
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0006-3525
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
The circular dichroism of double‐helical nucleic acids was calculated as a function of geometry, including terms involving n → π* transitions. The “nonbonding” n or σ orbitals were of the azine type, delocalized, but concentrated at the nitrogen atoms of the purines and pyrimidines. Dynamic coupling of the magnetic moments of the n → π* transitions with the electric moments of π → π* transitions generated important terms. Mixing of electric dipole character into n → π* transitions by the static electric field perturbation of the molecule is of lesser importance. The largest contributions of n → π* transitions to the circular dichroism of double‐helical nucleic acids are comparable in magnitude to the sum of π → π* terms only for geometries where the circular dichroism is weak. Using both n → π* and π → π* contributions one is able to match experimental and calculated circular dichroism spectra for DNA's over a much wider range of conditions than was possible previously.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract The circular dichroism of double‐helical nucleic acids was calculated using three different sets of wave functions for the purine and pyrimidine chromophores. Different wave functions give qualitatively the same types of spectra. Quantitatively, the differences are very substantial. How
On page 1533, in the last term of eq. (2), (alm[O) should be (alml0). On page 1538, in line 3 of the Results section, R,,\* should be Rn,\*; in the next line, RB should also be Rn,\*, and the first "in" should be "is.