✦ LIBER ✦

Calculation of χ2 for a 2 × 2 Table

✍ Scribed by WOOLF, B.

Book ID: 109567732
Publisher: Nature Publishing Group
Year: 1951
Tongue: English
Weight: 103 KB
Volume: 168
Category: Article
ISSN: 0028-0836
DOI: 10.1038/1681087a0

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Power calculations for detecting interac

Power calculations for detecting interaction in stratified 2×2 tables

✍ Joseph Gardiner; Dorothy Pathak; Alka Indurkhya 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 99 KB

Given several 2 × 2 contingency tables, the ÿrst step in epidemiologic research is to test for homogeneity of odds ratios across these tables. A second problem of equal interest, but often overlooked, is to evaluate the power of detection of interaction if it is present. We address the latter issue

A New Test for 2 × 2 Tables

✍ FISHER, R. A. 📂 Article 📅 1945 🏛 Nature Publishing Group 🌐 English ⚖ 122 KB

A New Test for 2 × 2 Tables

✍ BARNARD, G. A. 📂 Article 📅 1945 🏛 Nature Publishing Group 🌐 English ⚖ 226 KB

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS FOR A SINGLE 2×2 TABLE

✍ LOBAT HASHEMI; BALGOBIN NANDRAM; ROBERT GOLDBERG 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 376 KB 👁 2 views

The simple comparison of two binomial populations is frequently of interest in epidemiology when the domains are large. For small domains, however, there are no exact methods except Fisher's exact test. A basic problem, therefore, is to compare two populations by assessing the difference between the

PM algorithms for calculating minimum χ2

PM algorithms for calculating minimum χ2 estimators with partially observed sub-tables

✍ Ya'acov Ritov 📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 757 KB

A Modified Exact Test for 2 × 2 Continge

A Modified Exact Test for 2 × 2 Contingency Tables

✍ Dr. M. Haber 📂 Article 📅 1986 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 364 KB 👁 3 views

A modified exact test is proposed for 2 x 2 contingency tables. This test, which is based on a lees connervative definition of the concept of significance (STONE, 106s) is compared with a modified form of Pearson's X\* test and with Tocher's randomized exact (UMPU) test. The sizes of the new test li