๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Calcium channel blocker toxicity

โœ Scribed by Edward A Ramoska; Henry A Spiller; Amy Myers


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1990
Tongue
English
Weight
485 KB
Volume
19
Category
Article
ISSN
1097-6760

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


A retrospective review was conducted of all patients who were reported to a regional poison control center after "overdose" of a calcium channel blocker during a two-year period (1987 and 1988). An analysis of 91 patient cases is presented after excluding allergic reactions, cases involving coingestants, and patients lost to follow-up. Patients who developed any symptoms after ingestion were defined as manifesting toxicity. There were 38 cases of verapamil ingestion with toxicity developing in 18 patients. The mean nontoxic dose was 320 mg, whereas the mean toxic ingestion was 3.2 g. Nine patients became hypotensive, 13 developed conduction system abnormalities (sinus node suppression, atrioventricular nodal block, or bundle branch block), and 11 manifested arrhythmias. Ten developed neurological symptoms. There were 31 cases of nifedipine ingestion with toxicity developing in seven patients. The mean nontoxic dose was 19 mg, while the mean toxic ingestion was 340 mg. Four patients were hypotensive, only one developed cardiac conduction abnormalities, and four developed arrhythmias. Three had neurological symptoms. There were 24 cases of diltiazem ingestion with only minor toxicity developing in four patients. There was no statistically significant difference in the frequency of hypotension, arrhythmias, or neurological symptoms in patients who overdosed with verapamil as compared with nifedipine (by Fisher's exact test). However, conduction system abnormalities were more common with verapamil ingestion (P less than .05). Toxic manifestations after diltiazem over-dose were uncommon in our study. Eighteen of the 29 patients who developed toxicity required treatment in excess of gastrointestinal decontamination. Calcium was administered to 14 patients and was helpful in five.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Calcium-channel blockers and anaesthesia
โœ Pierre-Georges Durand; Jean-Jacques Lehot; Pierre Foรซx ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1991 ๐Ÿ› Springer-Verlag ๐ŸŒ French โš– 37 KB
Brain extraction of a calcium channel bl
โœ Dr. James C. Grotta; L. Creed Pettigrew; Alan H. Lockwood; Catherine Reich ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1987 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 459 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views
The calcium channel blocker verapamil in
โœ Thera P. Links; Edo P.J. Arnoldus; Axel R. Wintzen; Johannes van der Hoeven; J.J ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1998 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 83 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

pooled values of individual jitter were compared between study and control groups. SFEMG examination in radiculopathy patients did not show a definite jitter abnormality in any individual patient. Three patients had borderline increases of mean MCD, but these were within the normal limit values of T