๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Ca-dependent slow action potentials in neuromuscular diseases

โœ Scribed by L. Nicola Siri; A. L. Dubrovsky; O. D. Uchitel


Book ID
102884598
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1990
Tongue
English
Weight
640 KB
Volume
143
Category
Article
ISSN
0021-9541

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Argentina (A. L.D.)

slow Ca-dependent action potentials were studied in skeletal muscle fibers from different Neuromuscular Diseases (NMD). Byopsies were obtained from: 3 myopathies [Fascioscapulohumeral Dystrophy (FSH) and Polymyositis (PM)], 6 patients with other diseases (CD) [Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), Central Core Disease, Mitochondria1 Myopathy, Polyneuritis (PN), von Eulenberg's Paramyotonia], and 8 normal control muscles. Experiments were carried out in muscle fibers under current-clamp conditions. Membrane currents other than Ca ones were abolished or greatly diminished. Muscle fibers produced any of 3 types of responses, when stimulated by depolarizing pulses: fully developed Ca-action potentials (CaAP), abortive non-regenerative Ca responses (NrR), or only capacitive passive responses (WK).

The 3 types of responses were not dependent on the basal conditions of the fibers. The frequency of observation of CaAPs was significantly higher in myopathic disease. In rnyopathies, 46% of the muscle fibers had CaAPs, while only 22% of fibers from CD and 15% of the fibers from normal muscles showed CaAPs. N o differences were observed in the resting constants as well as in the CaAPs parameters between normal and diseased muscle fibers.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Slow frequency-dependence of action pote
โœ Balvinder S. Jassar; Peter A. Smith ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1991 ๐Ÿ› Springer ๐ŸŒ English โš– 759 KB

The afterhyperpolarization (AHP) which follows the action potential (AP) in bullfrog sympathetic ganglion B-cells involves activation of Ca 2+-sensitive K + conductances following Ca 2+ influx via Ca 2+ channels. The duration of AHPs evoked at 2-s stimulus intervals were 70.05 +3.76% of those evoked