Recent years have seen a shift in bullying research from a dyadic focus on the characteristics of the Bully and the Victim to the recognition of bullying as a whole group process, with the majority of children playing some kind of role. This study uses a shortened adaptation of the Participant Role
Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group
✍ Scribed by Christina Salmivalli; Kirsti Lagerspetz; Kaj Björkqvist; Karin Österman; Ari Kaukiainen
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1998
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 1013 KB
- Volume
- 22
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0096-140X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Bullying was investigated as a group process, a social phenomenon taking place in a school setting among 573 Finnish sixth-grade children (286 girls, 287 boys) aged 12-13 years. Different Participant Roles taken by individual children in the bullying process were examined and related to a) self-estimated behavior in bullying situations, b) social acceptance and social rejection, and c) belongingness to one of the five sociometric status groups (popular, rejected, neglected, controversial, and average). The Participant Roles assigned to the subjects were Victim, Bully, Reinforcer of the bully, Assistant of the bully, Defender of the victim, and Outsider. There were significant sex differences in the distribution of Participant Roles. Boys were more frequently in the roles of Bully, Reinforcer and Assistant, while the most frequent roles of the girls were those of Defender and Outsider. The subjects were moderately well aware of their Participant Roles, although they underestimated their participation in active bullying behavior and emphasized that they acted as Defenders and 0utsiders.The sociometric status of the children was found to be connected to their Participant Roles. 0 19% Wiley-Liss, he.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES