## Abstract ## Purpose To assess concerns that the European Union Physical Agents Directive (EU PAD) on Electromagnetic Fields (EMF) could seriously restrict the use of MRI for research, diagnosis, and treatment, this study was conducted to examine the impact of the EU PAD on research practice, fo
British association of MR radiographers (BAMRR) safety survey 2005: Potential impact of European Union (EU) Physical Agents Directive (PAD) on electromagnetic fields (EMF)
✍ Scribed by Elizabeth A. Moore; Erica D. Scurr
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2007
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 205 KB
- Volume
- 26
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1053-1807
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Purpose
To measure the potential impact on clinical MRI practice in the UK of the European Union (EU) Physical Agents Directive (PAD) on electromagnetic fields (EMF). There is evidence that the exposure limit values contained in the PAD will make it impossible for members of staff to stand close to the magnet during scanning; currently this is common practice in order to provide care and support for vulnerable patients. Interventional MR procedures will also be impossible.
Materials and Methods
Members of the British Association of MR Radiographers (BAMRR) were sent a questionnaire to assess the impact of the PAD and related safety issues.
Results
A total of 25% of responding sites have at least one sedation/general anesthesia (GA) session per week, while only 3% reported any interventional practice. A total of 29% of respondents reported that operators give a bolus injection by hand during contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE‐MRA) scans. Overall it is estimated that 3% of all MR examinations in the UK are performed with a staff member in the magnet room. Some of these examinations would be impossible without staff in the room and it would be necessary for patients to have computed tomography (CT) instead of MRI. The additional radiation dose of substituting CT for MRI is estimated at 224 man‐sievert per year.
Conclusion
While the financial costs of implementing the PAD (EMF) are relatively low, the social costs are difficult to quantify but potentially more alarming. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2007;26:1303–1307. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES