𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Breast cancer risk in relation to abortion: Results from the EPIC study

✍ Scribed by Gillian K. Reeves; Sau-Wan Kan; Tim Key; Anne Tjønneland; Anja Olsen; Kim Overvad; Petra H. Peeters; Françoise Clavel-Chapelon; Xavier Paoletti; Franco Berrino; Vittorio Krogh; Domenico Palli; Rosario Tumino; Salvatore Panico; Paulo Vineis; Carlos A. Gonzalez; Eva Ardanaz; Carmen Martinez; Pilar Amiano; José R. Quiros; Maria R. Tormo; Kay-Tee Khaw; Antonia Trichopoulou; Theodora Psaltopoulou; Victoria Kalapothaki; Gabriele Nagel; Jenny Chang-Claude; Heiner Boeing; Petra H. Lahmann; Elisabet Wirfält; Rudolf Kaaks; Elio Riboli


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2006
Tongue
French
Weight
261 KB
Volume
119
Category
Article
ISSN
0020-7136

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

The role of spontaneous and induced abortion on breast cancer risk is examined among 267,361 women recruited into the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and nutrition between 1992 and 2000. The data were collected from 20 centers, across 9 countries, and included information on a total of 4,805 women with breast cancer, of whom 1,657 reported having ever had any type of abortion. Overall, the relative risk of breast cancer in women who reported ever having had a spontaneous abortion was not significantly elevated when compared with women who reported never having had such an abortion (RR = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.99–1.14). However, there was some evidence of a slight increase in the risk of breast cancer among women who reported having had 2 or more spontaneous abortions (1.20, 1.07–1.35). The relative risk of breast cancer among women who reported ever having had an induced abortion when compared to women who reported never having had an induced abortion was 0.95 (0.87–1.03). Overall, the findings provide further unbiased evidence of the lack of an adverse effect of induced abortion on breast cancer risk. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Breast cancer in relation to abortion: R
✍ Joel Brind 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 French ⚖ 47 KB 👁 1 views

In a recent report in this journal, Reeves et al. 1 concluded that their ''findings provide further unbiased evidence of the lack of an adverse effect of induced abortion on breast cancer risk.'' The boldness of their claim that their own work is ''unbiased'' is reminiscent of a 1982 paper 2 in whic

Abortion history and breast cancer risk:
✍ Maureen Sanderson; Xiao-Ou Shu; Fan Jin; Qi Dai; Wanqing Wen; Yi Hua; Yu-Tang Ga 📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 French ⚖ 61 KB

Studies of the association between induced abortion and breast cancer risk have been inconsistent, perhaps due to underreporting of abortions. Induced abortion is a well-accepted family planning procedure in China, and women who have several induced abortions do not feel stigmatized. The authors use

Induced and spontaneous abortion and bre
✍ Xavier Paoletti; Françoise Clavel-Chapelon 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 French ⚖ 84 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract Recent reviews reach conflicting conclusions on breast cancer risk after spontaneous or induced abortion. E3N is a large‐scale cohort study collecting detailed information on environmental and reproductive factors. We investigated the relation between breast cancer and a history of indu

Risk of endometrial cancer in relationsh
✍ Mustafa Al-Zoughool; Laure Dossus; Rudolf Kaaks; Françoise Clavel-Chapelon; Anne 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 French ⚖ 103 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract Current epidemiologic evidence indicates that cigarette smoking reduces the risk of endometrial cancer. We examined data from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort to analyze further aspects of the smoking‐endometrial cancer relationship, such as