Boundary value methods: The third way between linear multistep and Runge-Kutta methods
β Scribed by L. Brugnano; D. Trigiante
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1998
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 828 KB
- Volume
- 36
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0898-1221
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
It is weti known that the approximation of the solutions of ODEs by means of k-step methods transforms a first-order continuous problem in a kth-order discrete one. Such transformation has the undesired effect of introducing spurious, or parasitic, solutions to be kept under control. It is such control which is responsible of the main drawbacks (e.g., the two Dahlqukt barriers) of the classical LMF with respect to Runge-Kntta methods. It is, however, less known that the control of the parasitic solutions is much easier if the problem is transformed into an almost equivalent boundary value problem. Starting from such an idea, a new class of multistep methods, called Boundary Value Methods (BVMs), has been proposed and analyzed in the last few years. Of course, they are free of barriers. Moreover, a block version of such methods presents some similarity with Runge-Kutta schemes, although still maintaining the advantages of being linear methods. In this paper, the recent results on the subject are reviewed.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
One of the most popular approaches to the numerical solution of two-point boundary value problems is shooting. However this approach is often ineffective for singularly perturbed problems due to the possible presence of rapidly increasing modes which cannot be dealt with using an initial value solve
## Communicated by W. Tornig A linear stability condition is derived for explicit Runge-Kutta methods to solve the compressible Navier-Stokes equations by central second-order finite-difference and finite-volume methods. The equations in non-conservative form are simplified to quasilinear form, an