Mature sciences have been long been characterized in terms of the “successfulness”, “reliability” or “trustworthiness” of their theoretical, experimental or technical accomplishments. Today many philosophers of science talk of “robustness”, often without specifying in a precise way the meaning of th
[Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science] Characterizing the Robustness of Science Volume 292 || Introduction: The Solidity of Scientific Achievements: Structure of the Problem, Difficulties, Philosophical Implications
✍ Scribed by Soler, Léna; Trizio, Emiliano; Nickles, Thomas; Wimsatt, William
- Book ID
- 120230996
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Year
- 2012
- Weight
- 750 KB
- Category
- Article
- ISBN
- 9400727593
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
Mature sciences have been long been characterized in terms of the “successfulness”, “reliability” or “trustworthiness” of their theoretical, experimental or technical accomplishments. Today many philosophers of science talk of “robustness”, often without specifying in a precise way the meaning of th
Mature sciences have been long been characterized in terms of the “successfulness”, “reliability” or “trustworthiness” of their theoretical, experimental or technical accomplishments. Today many philosophers of science talk of “robustness”, often without specifying in a precise way the meaning of th
Mature sciences have been long been characterized in terms of the “successfulness”, “reliability” or “trustworthiness” of their theoretical, experimental or technical accomplishments. Today many philosophers of science talk of “robustness”, often without specifying in a precise way the meaning of th
Mature sciences have been long been characterized in terms of the “successfulness”, “reliability” or “trustworthiness” of their theoretical, experimental or technical accomplishments. Today many philosophers of science talk of “robustness”, often without specifying in a precise way the meaning of th