An important issue in dose finding is whether a further dose increment leads to a relevant increase in efficacy. Clinical efficacy should not be considered by point zero null hypotheses. Instead, shifted hypotheses for the difference or the ratio can be used. Because the a priori definition of a rel
Bootstrap Confidence Intervals for Effective Doses in the Probit Model for Dose-Response Data
✍ Scribed by Hans-Georg Müller; Jane-Ling Wang
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2007
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 791 KB
- Volume
- 32
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0323-3847
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Parametric bootstrap methods for the construction of confidence intervals for the effective dose at level α(EDα) under the probit model for the dose‐response relationship are investigated. The standard maximum likelihood confidence intervals and percentile, centered percentile, studentized, bias corrected and better bias corrected bootstrap methods are compared in a simulation with 1000 Monte Carlo runs and 1000 bootstrap samples. Among the bootstrap methods, studentized and centered percentile methods are found to behave unfavorably with respect to observed coverage probability, whereas the bias corrected and better bias corrected bootstrap sometimes improve on the maximum likelihood method. The maximum likelihood method yielded very mixed results, but in our simulation none of the currently available bootstrap methods improved uniformly on this standard method. The methods are illustrated by an application to a bioassay.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
Usually, in teratological dose finding studies, there are not only threshold effects but also extra variations that cannot be accounted for by the beta-binomial model alone. The beta-binomial model assumes correlation between fetuses in the same litter. The general random effect threshold (RE) model