๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Bootstrap approach for constructing confidence intervals for population pharmacokinetic parameters. I: a use of bootstrap standard error

โœ Scribed by Akifumi Yafune; Makio Ishiguro


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1999
Tongue
English
Weight
215 KB
Volume
18
Category
Article
ISSN
0277-6715

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


In population pharmacokinetic studies, one of the main objectives is to estimate population pharmacokinetic parameters specifying the population distributions of pharmacokinetic parameters. Confidence intervals for population pharmacokinetic parameters are generally estimated by assuming the asymptotic normality, which is a large-sample property, that is, a property which holds for the cases where sample sizes are large enough. In actual clinical trials, however, sample sizes are limited and not so large in general. Likelihood functions in population pharmacokinetic modelling include a multiple integral and are quite complicated. We hence suspect that the sample sizes of actual trials are often not large enough for assuming the asymptotic normality and that the asymptotic confidence intervals underestimate the uncertainties of the estimates of population pharmacokinetic parameters. As an alternative to the asymptotic normality approach, we can employ a bootstrap approach. This paper proposes a bootstrap standard error approach for constructing confidence intervals for population pharmacokinetic parameters. Comparisons between the asymptotic and bootstrap confidence intervals are made through applications to a simulated data set and an actual phase I trial.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Bootstrap approach for constructing conf
โœ Akifumi Yafune; Makio Ishiguro ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1999 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 133 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

For population pharmacokinetics in phase I trials, the standard two-stage (STS) method is quite appealing, especially to non-statisticians, because the method is theoretically and computationally simple. The method, however, does not take into account the uncertainty in estimating individual-specifi