## Abstract ## Purpose To evaluate magnetic field interactions at 1.5‐ and 3‐Tesla for implantable pulse generators (IPGs) and radiofrequency (RF) receivers used for implantable neurostimulation systems. ## Materials and Methods Measurements of magnetically induced displacement force and torque
Biomedical implants and devices: Assessment of magnetic field interactions with a 3.0-Tesla MR system
✍ Scribed by Frank G. Shellock
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2002
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 111 KB
- Volume
- 16
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1053-1807
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate magnetic field interactions for 109 different biomedical implants and devices in association with exposure to a 3.0‐Tesla magnetic resonance (MR) system.
Materials and Methods
A total of 109 implants and devices (aneurysm clips, 32; clips, fasteners, and staples, 10; coils and stents, 10; heart valve prostheses and annuloplasty rings, 12; orthopedic implants, five; suture materials, 13; vascular access ports and accessories, 13; miscellaneous implants and devices, 14) were tested for magnetic field interactions at 3.0‐Tesla using previously‐described, standardized techniques to assess magnetic field translational attraction and torque.
Results
The deflection angles and torque measurements ranged, respectively, from 0 to 16° and 0 to +2 for the aneurysm clips; 0 to 90° and 0 to +4 for the clips, fasteners, and staples; 0 to 47° and 0 to +4 for the coils and stents; 0 to 4° and 0 to +1 for the heart valve prostheses and annuloplasty rings; 0 to 12° and 0 to +2 for the orthopedic implants; 0 to 13° and 0 to +2 for the suture materials; 0 to 52° and 0 to +4 for the vascular access ports and accessories; and 0 to 28° and 0 to +3 for the miscellaneous implants and devices.
Conclusion
Of the 109 implants and devices assessed for magnetic field interactions at 3.0‐Tesla, four (4%) are potentially unsafe based on deflection angle criteria. The implications of these results for patients undergoing MR procedures at 3.0‐Tesla is discussed. Notably, these results are specific to the 3.0‐Tesla MR system used for this evaluation. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2002;16:721–732. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES