Biological assessment of the bone-screw interface after insertion of uncoated and hydroxyapatite-coated pedicular screws in the osteopenic sheep
✍ Scribed by Fini, M. ;Giavaresi, G. ;Greggi, T. ;Martini, L. ;Aldini, N. Nicoli ;Parisini, P. ;Giardino, R.
- Book ID
- 102872027
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2003
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 594 KB
- Volume
- 66A
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0021-9304
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
The sheep seems to be a promising model of osteoporosis and biomaterial osteointegration in osteopenic bone. The long‐term ovariectomized sheep model was used for the biological investigation of bone healing around uncoated and hydroxyapatite (HA)‐coated pedicle screws in osteopenic bone. Four sheep were ovariectomized and four sheep were sham‐operated. Twenty‐four months after surgery, the animals were implanted with uncoated and HA‐coated stainless steel screws in the lumbar vertebral pedicles. Four months later, bone‐to‐implant contact, bone ingrowth, and bone hardness were measured around screws. Uncoated stainless steel presented significantly (p < 0.0005) lower bone‐to‐implant contact in healthy and osteopenic bone compared with HA‐coated stainless steel. HA significantly improved bone ingrowth in healthy bone (p < 0.05) compared with uncoated stainless steel. Osteopenia significantly (p < 0.05) reduced the area of bone ingrowth around the screw threads for both types of implants. In the inner thread area, bone microhardness significantly increased (p < 0.05) in HA‐coated surface versus uncoated for healthy and osteopenic bone. HA coating significantly enhances bone‐to‐implant contact also in osteopenic bone in comparison with uncoated stainless steel surfaces. Bone ingrowth and mineralization are ameliorated by the osteoconductive HA coating. However, osteopenia seems to greatly influence bone ingrowth processes around the implanted screws regardless of the characteristics of the material surface. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 66A: 176–183, 2003