๐”– Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

๐Ÿ“

Bioethics, Public Moral Argument, and Social Responsibility

โœ Scribed by Nancy M. P. King (eds.), Michael J. Hyde (eds.)


Publisher
Routledge
Year
2012
Tongue
English
Leaves
197
Category
Library

โฌ‡  Acquire This Volume

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


"Bioethics, Public Moral Argument, and Social Responsibility explores the role of democratically oriented argument in promoting public understanding and discussion of the benefits and burdens of biotechnological progress. The contributors examine moral and policy controversies surrounding biomedical technologies and their place in American society, beginning with an examination of discourse and moral authority in democracy, and addressing a set of issues that include: dignity in health care; the social responsibilities of scientists, journalists, and scholars; and the language of genetics and moral responsibility. Much discussion of biotechnological advances rests on the rights of individuals to make autonomous choices and on societal decisions not to interfere with willing buyers and sellers. But intensifying democratic debates about key issues like health insurance reform and genetic research have begun to broaden our public vision, to include awareness of cost, a sense of collective responsibility to help others, and the need to work together to set limits we can live with. In scholarly journals, newspapers, magazines, on television, radio, and hundreds of web sites, public moral argument about the benefits and burdens of biotechnology is ubiquitous. Science and society have thus created an increasingly fragmented discourse, which we need to examine together. The book's authors, experts from the sciences and humanities, step beyond their disciplinary boundaries to assume the ethical responsibility of translating their expertise into forms that help promote fruitful public conversation."--


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Euthanasia, Ethics and Public Policy: An
โœ John Keown ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2018 ๐Ÿ› Cambridge University Press ๐ŸŒ English

This book argues against the legalisation of voluntary euthanasia and/or physician-assisted suicide on the ground that, even if they were ethically defensible in certain 'hard cases', neither could be effectively controlled by law. It maintains that the experience of legalisation in the Netherlands,

Bioethical Decision Making and Argumenta
โœ Pedro Serna, Josรฉ-Antonio Seoane (eds.) ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2016 ๐Ÿ› Springer International Publishing ๐ŸŒ English

<p>This book clarifies the meaning of the most important and pervasive concepts and tools in bioethical argumentation (principles, values, dignity, rights, duties, deliberation, prudence) and assesses the methodological suitability of the main methods for clinical decision-making and argumentation.

Social dimensions of moral responsibilit
โœ Hutchison, Katrina; Mackenzie, Catriona; Oshana, Marina ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2018 ๐Ÿ› Oxford University Press ๐ŸŒ English

"To what extent are we responsible for our actions? Philosophical theorizing about this question has recently taken a social turn, marking a shift in focus from traditional metaphysical concerns about free will and determinism. Recent theories have attended to the interpersonal dynamics at the hea