Bioequivalence Trials with the Incomplete 3 × 3 Crossover Design
✍ Scribed by Nam-Kyoo Lim; Sang-Gue Park; Ed Stanek
- Book ID
- 101711310
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2005
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 107 KB
- Volume
- 47
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0323-3847
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
In bioequivalence trials, one often considers two or more generic products with the original one. The 3 x 3 crossover design can be adopted to evaluate the two generic candidates with a brand name drug, rather than conducting two separate 2 x 2 crossover trials. Dropouts, however, are more likely to occur due to various administrative reasons when we consider a higher order crossover design. A modified method, which was originally given by Chow and Shao (1997), is extended to compare two generic products with a reference in the incomplete 3 x 3 crossover design. A simulation study and discussion are also presented.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Splitting balanced incomplete block designs were first formulated by Ogata, Kurosawa, Stinson, and Saido recently in the investigation of authentication codes. This article investigates the existence of splitting balanced incomplete block designs, i.e., (__v__, 3__k__, λ)‐splitting BIBD