๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Bioavailability of atenolol formulations

โœ Scribed by Dr. James McAinsh; Wilfred T. Simpson; Brian F. Holmes; Jean Young; Stuart H. Ellis


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1980
Tongue
English
Weight
417 KB
Volume
1
Category
Article
ISSN
0142-2782

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Abstract

In this comparative bioavailability study two tablet formulations of atenolol (sales and clinical trial) were compared with an oral solution. Twelve healthy adult male volunteers received, on a crossโ€over basis, on three separate occasions, 100 mg oral dose of the three formulations of atenolol. Bioavailability was based on concentrations of atenolol in whole blood and urine. The atenolol blood levels peaked at approximately 3 h after dosing, with individual values ranging from 0ยท21 to 0ยท92 ฮผg ml^โˆ’1^ (a fourโ€fold difference), with all three formulations. Threeโ€fold variations among subjects occurred in the areas under the curve (AUC) and urinary recoveries. The average elimination halfโ€life of atenolol was between 6 and 7 h for all three formulations. Some statistically significant differences were observed between the tablets and the aqueous solution: the AUC (โˆž) and mean peak blood concentrations were significantly greater with the U.K. sales tablet than the solution, and the mean concentrations in the blood at certain specified times after administration were significantly greater with the two tablet formulations than the solution. The profiles of absorption and excretion of the two tablet formulations were similar.

No adverse reactions were encountered in this study and all subjects completed the study without incident.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Bioavailability in man of atenolol and c
โœ James McAinsh; William Bastain; Jean Young; John D. Harry ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1981 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 428 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

## Abstract In this comparative bioavailability study in 12 healthy volunteers the blood level profiles and urinary recoveries of both atenolol and chlorthalidone were studied following the administration of the drug as a fixed combination (โ€˜Tenoreticโ€™), as a free combination, and individually, at

Bioavailability in man of atenolol and c
โœ James McAinsh; Brian H. Holmes; Timothy J. Fitzsimons; Jean Young ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1986 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 438 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

In this comparative bioavailability study in 12 healthy volunteers the blood level profiles and urinary recoveries of both atenolol and chlorthalidone were studied following the administration of the drugs as a fixed combination ('Tenoret 50'). as a free combination, and individually, at doses of 50

Bioavailability of sustained release pro
โœ James McAinsh; Nigel S. Baber; Brian F. Holmes; Jean Young; Stuart H. Ellis ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1981 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 377 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

## Abstract In this comparative bioavailability study two sustained release capsule formulations of propranolol, one a clinical trial formulation and the other the U.K. sales formulation (โ€˜Inderalโ€™ LA), were compared with a conventional โ€˜Inderalโ€™ tablet. Twelve healthy adult male volunteers receive

Bioavailability of propranolol and bendr
โœ James McAinsh; Brian F. Holmes; Nigel S. Baber; Jean Young ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1981 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 395 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

## Abstract In this comparative bioavailability study in 12 healthy volunteers the blood level profiles of both propranolol and bendrofluazide were studied following the multiple oral administration of the drugs as a fixed combination (Indereticยฎ) and as a free combination at doses of 80 mg propran

Comparative bioavailability of two oral
โœ Francisco J. Flores-Murrieta; Alejandra Toledo; Miriam del Carmen Carrasco-Portu ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2005 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 79 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

The current requirement of the Mexican Authorities to demonstrate the interchangeability of ranitidine formulations is to establish that the dissolution profile of the drug shows similarity. In order to establish if this requirement is adequate, the bioavailability of two formulations that did not m