## Abstract In a study on 25 patients with verified benign bone tumors, bioactive glass (BG) and autogenous bone (AB) were used as bone‐graft substitutes. The patients were randomized into two groups according to the filling material. Blood samples were taken both preoperatively, at 2 weeks, and 3,
Bioactive glass and autogenous bone as bone graft substitutes in benign bone tumors
✍ Scribed by Nina C. Lindfors; Jouni T. Heikkilä; Ilona Koski; Kimmo Mattila; Allan J. Aho
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2008
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 191 KB
- Volume
- 90B
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1552-4973
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
In a prospective randomized study, 25 patients with benign bone tumors were surgically treated with either bioactive glass S53P4 (BG) or autogenous bone (AB) as bone graft material. X‐rays were taken preoperatively and postoperatively at 2 weeks and at 3, 8, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months. In addition, for most of the patients, CT scans were performed at the same time‐points. No infections or material‐related adverse reactions occurred in any patient. The filled cavity was replaced faster by new bone in the AB group than in the BG group (p = 0.0001). However, at 36 months, no statistical difference in cavity volume between the two groups was observed on X‐rays (p = 0.7881) or on CT scans (p = 0.9117). In the BG group at 3 years, the filled cavity appeared, however, dense on X‐rays, and glass granules on CT scans were observed. During the follow‐up period, the cortical thickness seemed to increase more in the BG group than in the AB group (p < 0.0001). © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 2009
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
The applicability of bioactive glass (BG) granules as a levels of TGF-ͱ1 and type I collagen mRNAs during the substitute for bone grafts was tested by comparing the first 2 weeks of healing, whereas BG-filled defects showed histologic, histomorphometric, and molecular biologic heal-biphasic expressi
## Abstract Previous investigations have shown that both the early biological response and the mechanical properties of a porous hydroxyapatite bone graft substitute are highly sensitive to its pore structure. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the pore structure continued to influ
## Abstract Long‐term results are reported in 23 patients and short‐term results in 30 patients presenting with bone tumors treated by curettage or resection followed by implantation of hydroxyapatite (HA) or highly purified beta‐tricalcium phosphate (β‐TCP), respectively. Mean follow‐up was 97 and