Bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation in a patient with cervical dystonia and essential tremor
โ Scribed by Kelvin L. Chou; Howard I. Hurtig; Jurg L. Jaggi; Gordon H. Baltuch
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2005
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 98 KB
- Volume
- 20
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0885-3185
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Abstract
The role of subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) is well established in Parkinson's disease, but experience with STN DBS in other movement disorders is limited. We report on a patient with medically refractory cervical dystonia and essential tremor resulting in dystonic head tremor and action tremor of the hands who obtained complete tremor suppression and near resolution of her cervical dystonia with bilateral STN stimulation. The results in this case demonstrate that STN DBS can dramatically improve dystonia and tremor in nonparkinsonian movement disorders. ยฉ 2004 Movement Disorder Society
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Chronic subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STNโDBS) is an efficacious treatment for idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) that cannot be further improved by medical therapy. We present a case of an individual with juvenile parkinsonism caused by homozygous deletion of exon 3 in t
## Abstract To determine whether the degree to which a patient with Parkinson's disease expects therapeutic benefit from subthalamic nucleusโdeep brain stimulation (STNโDBS) influences the magnitude of his or her improved motor response, 10 patients with idiopathic Parkinson's and bilateral STNโDBS
## Abstract Idiopathic cranialโcervical dystonia (ICCD) is an adultโonset dystonia syndrome affecting orbicularis oculi, facial, oromandibular, and cervical musculature. ICCD is frequently difficult to treat medically. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the globus pallidus internus (GPi) is a highly e
## Abstract The original article to which this Erratum refers was published in __Movement__ Disorders, Volume 19, Issue 12, pages 1451โ1453. In the brief report by Capecci and colleagues that appears in this issue of __Movement__ Disorders, the authors mistakenly refer to the patient's 30โyearโold