Biexponential parameterization of diffusion and T2 relaxation decay curves in a rat muscle edema model: Decay curve components and water compartments
✍ Scribed by Zaid Ababneh; Helene Beloeil; Charles B. Berde; Giulio Gambarota; Stephan E. Maier; Robert V. Mulkern
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2005
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 286 KB
- Volume
- 54
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0740-3194
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Quantitative T~2~ relaxation and diffusion imaging studies of a rat muscle edema model were performed in order to determine the effects of intra‐ and extracellular water compartmentation on the respective decay curves. The right hind paw of rats was injected with a carrageenan solution to generate edematous muscle. A Carr–Purcell–Meiboom–Gill (CPMG) imaging sequence was used to acquire T~2~ relaxation decay curves from both paws. A line scan diffusion imaging (LSDI) sequence was then used to acquire diffusion decay curves from the same paws over a wide b‐factor range. Measurements were made from both edematous muscle (EM) and control muscle (CM). The EM and CM T~2~ relaxation decay curves were best fit with biexponential functions. The fraction of the fast T~2~ component dropped dramatically from approximately 0.95 in CM to 0.45 in EM, consistent with a water compartmentation model in which the fast and slow T~2~ components reflect intra‐ and extracellular water, respectively. Both CM and EM diffusion decay curves required biexponential fitting functions, and the diffusion coefficients of the fast and slow components were substantially larger in EM than CM. The fraction of the fast diffusion component, however, was not radically altered between CM and EM conditions (0.84 versus 0.89 for CM versus EM). Assuming a model in which intra‐ and extracellular water compartments are responsible for the fast and slow T~2~‐decay components and for the slow and fast diffusion decay components, respectively, leads to fractional sizes of the diffusion components that are not supported by experiment. We conclude that intra‐ and extracellular water compartmentation is a reasonable interpretation for the two T~2~‐decay components in both CM and EM but that other factors, such as restricted diffusion and/or alternate forms of water compartmentation like surface versus volume water, most probably have profound influences on the precise shapes of the diffusion decay curves, a complete understanding of which will require significant theoretical work. Magn Reson Med, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.