๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Biased predictors, rationality and the evaluation of forecasts

โœ Scribed by Arnold Zellner

Book ID
116099998
Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1986
Tongue
English
Weight
242 KB
Volume
21
Category
Article
ISSN
0165-1765

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Evaluating the Rationality of Fixed-even
Evaluating the Rationality of Fixed-event Forecasts
โœ MICHAEL P. CLEMENTS ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1997 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 211 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

A test of forecast rationality based on the weak eciency of ยฎxed-event forecasts was proposed by Nordhaus (1987). This paper considers the scope for pooling ยฎxed-event forecasts across `events', to deliver more powerful tests of the weak-eciency hypothesis, when only a small number of ยฎxedevent fore

Robust evaluation of fixed-event forecas
Robust evaluation of fixed-event forecast rationality
โœ Michael P. Clements; Nick Taylor ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2001 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 124 KB

## Abstract In this paper we introduce a new testing procedure for evaluating the rationality of fixedโ€event forecasts based on a pseudoโ€maximum likelihood estimator. The procedure is designed to be robust to departures in the normality assumption. A model is introduced to show that such departures