## Abstract The use of discreteβchoice contingent valuation (CV) to elicit individuals' preference, expressed as maximum willingnessβtoβpay (WTP), although primarily developed in environmental economics, has been popular in the economic evaluation of health and healthcare. However, a concern with t
β¦ LIBER β¦
Bias in Discrete Response Contingent Valuation
β Scribed by Barbara J. Kanninen
- Book ID
- 115623433
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1995
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 668 KB
- Volume
- 28
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0095-0696
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Empirical implications of response acqui
β
Raymond Y. T. Yeung; Richard D. Smith; Lai-Ming Ho; Janice M. Johnston; Gabriel
π
Article
π
2006
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 158 KB
Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuat
β
W. Michael Hanemann
π
Article
π
1989
π
Oxford University Press
π
English
β 782 KB
Minimising Payment Vehicle Bias in Conti
β
M. D. Morrison; R. K. Blamey; J. W. Bennett
π
Article
π
2000
π
Springer
π
English
β 60 KB
Comparing continuous and discrete contin
β
Bengt KristrΓΆm
π
Article
π
1993
π
Springer
π
English
β 490 KB
Evidence of range bias in contingent val
β
David K. Whynes; Jane L. Wolstenholme; Emma Frew
π
Article
π
2004
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 115 KB
The payment scale format has been widely used in willingness-to-pay studies in health care. Concerns have been expressed that the format is, in theory, prone to range bias, although this proposition has not been tested directly. We report the findings of a contingent valuation questionnaire study of
Protest Responses in Contingent Valuatio
β
Bradley S. Jorgensen; Geoffrey J. Syme; Brian J. Bishop; Blair E. Nancarrow
π
Article
π
1999
π
Springer
π
English
β 85 KB