## Abstract One of the key advantages of meta‐analysis (i.e., a quantitative literature review) over a narrative literature review is that it allows for formal tests of interaction effects—namely, whether the relationship between two variables is contingent upon the value of another (moderator) var
Best-practice recommendations for estimating interaction effects using moderated multiple regression
✍ Scribed by Herman Aguinis; Ryan K. Gottfredson
- Book ID
- 102391960
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2010
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 100 KB
- Volume
- 31
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0894-3796
- DOI
- 10.1002/job.686
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
An interaction effect indicates that a relationship is contingent upon the values of another (moderator) variable. Thus, interaction effects describe conditions under which relationships change in strength and/or direction. Understanding interaction effects is essential for the advancement of the organizational sciences because they highlight a theory's boundary conditions. We describe procedures for estimating and interpreting interaction effects using moderated multiple regression (MMR). We distill the technical literature for a general readership of organizational science researchers and include specific best‐practice recommendations regarding actions researchers can take before and after data collection to improve the accuracy of MMR‐based conclusions regarding interaction effects. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES