✦ LIBER ✦

Benefits of the iQ200 automated urine microscopy analyser in routine urinalysis

✍ Scribed by van den Broek, Daan; Keularts, Irene M.L.W.; Wielders, Jos P.M.; Kraaijenhagen, Rob J.

Book ID: 125465141
Publisher: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG
Year: 2008
Tongue: English
Weight: 92 KB
Volume: 46
Category: Article
ISSN: 1434-6621
DOI: 10.1515/cclm.2008.317

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Preliminary evaluation of the Iris IQ™ 2

Preliminary evaluation of the Iris IQ™ 200 automated urine analyser

✍ Alves, Lia; Ballester, Frederic; Camps, Jordi; Joven, Jorge 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG 🌐 English ⚖ 85 KB

Analytical performance of the Iris iQ200

Analytical performance of the Iris iQ200 automated urine microscopy analyzer

✍ Solveig Linko; Timo T. Kouri; Eila Toivonen; Paivi H. Ranta; Eric Chapoulaud; Ma 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 363 KB

Automated urinalysis: first experiences

Automated urinalysis: first experiences and a comparison between the Iris iQ200 urine microscopy system, the Sysmex UF-100 flow cytometer and manual microscopic particle counting

✍ Shayanfar, Noushin; Tobler, Ulrich; von Eckardstein, Arnold; Bestmann, Lukas 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG 🌐 English ⚖ 112 KB

Automated Urinalysis and Urine Dipstick

Automated Urinalysis and Urine Dipstick in the Emergency Evaluation of Young Febrile Children

✍ Kanegaye, J. T.; Jacob, J. M.; Malicki, D. 📂 Article 📅 2014 🏛 American Academy of Pediatrics 🌐 English ⚖ 680 KB

Clinical laboratory automated urinalysis

Clinical laboratory automated urinalysis: comparison among automated microscopy, flow cytometry, two test strips analyzers, and manual microscopic examination of the urine sediments

✍ S. Mayo; D. Acevedo; C. Quiñones-Torrelo; I. Canós; M. Sancho 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 136 KB

## Abstract Urinalysis is one of the habitual clinical laboratory procedures, which implies that one of the largest sample volumes currently requires significant labor to examine microscopic sediments. Different analyzers currently used to perform this task have been compared with the manual micros